On November 4th, residents of District 3 will choose between two Democrats for San Diego City Council -- Todd Gloria and Stephen Whitburn.  For voters hoping to stay away from Democrats, one candidate may be as bad as another, and these are slim pickings.  But for other voters, choosing between two great candidates might come down to a coin toss.

In an effort to avoid deciding by this time honored, but willy-nilly method, I contacted both candidates' campaigns hoping the choice would become easier.  (Read the full transcripts: Stephen Whitburn's Responses, Todd Gloria's Responses) 

Unfortunately, even after Mr. Gloria's and Mr. Whitburn's equally gracious responses, the decision will remain challenging.

Rather than decide based on party lines, this race may just boil down to what each voter values most.  Do you value the perspective of a third-generation native Dist. 3 resident with the pedigree and blessing of popular Congresswoman Susan Davis (D-53rd District)?  Or do you value 26 years of experience in business and elected office, and the backing of the San Diego Democratic Party and notables Donna Frye and Bob Filner?  If the candidates' support networks matter most, as Chuck wrote, the voter's choice is made.  If, however, official recommendations fail to sway, then take a look at what the candidates had to say to me on these topics:

    On Safety:

Todd Gloria prioritizes reestablishing the Community Relations Officers to improve the area's poor safety record.  Stephen Whitburn has proposed a more detailed, comprehensive plan, including: alley lighting, a Crime Stopper's Reward Fund, "bringing back District Three's Community Relations Officers," and "encouraging and promoting Neighborhood Watch, Citizen Patrols, and Retired Senior Volunteer Patrol (RSVP) Programs." 

On this issue, I prefer Mr. Whitburn's ideas because they address both community members' involvement and the city's policymaking role.