Categories
- Sports
- Recreation
- Alcohol
- Gay/Lesbian
- Public Space
- Stadium
- Technology
- Education
- Parenting
- Child Development
- Military
- Video Games
- terrorism
- Airport
- Health Care
- Electronic Voting
- Alternative Energy
- Media
- Public Safety
- Shopping
- Ethics
- Abortion
- Legal
- Art
- Religion
- Chargers
- Environment
- Government Policies
- Global Warming
- Growth & Development
- Youth
- Smoking
- Economy
- Iraq
- Holidays
- Election
- Immigration
- Uncategorized
Forest Conservation vs. Recreation
A controversial battle of conservation versus recreation is heating up in San Diego County's backcountry. The U.S. Forest Service wants to close three popular rock climbing and hiking areas in Cleveland National Forest during the nesting season for golden eagles and falcons, from December through May. Environmentalists' agree with the proposal, and want to protect these dwindling species' cliff-side nests. Climbers and hikers say the restrictions go too far.
What do you think? Should recreational forest access be limited to protect nature?
Please refrain from profane, derogatory or off-topic comments. Read Guidelines>>
-
19 Comments
| Email this |
-
-
-
- | Permalink:
Page 1 of 1 pages
