Categories
- Sports
- Recreation
- Alcohol
- Gay/Lesbian
- Public Space
- Stadium
- Technology
- Education
- Parenting
- Child Development
- Military
- Video Games
- terrorism
- Airport
- Health Care
- Electronic Voting
- Alternative Energy
- Media
- Public Safety
- Shopping
- Ethics
- Abortion
- Legal
- Art
- Religion
- Chargers
- Environment
- Government Policies
- Global Warming
- Growth & Development
- Youth
- Smoking
- Economy
- Iraq
- Holidays
- Election
- Immigration
- Uncategorized
Is the Department of Homeland Security Protective or Ineffective?
It's been nearly five years since the creation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The move was recognized as the most significant reorganization of the federal government in more than fifty years. It brought together 200,000 federal employees and two dozen other law enforcement agencies to protect the U.S. from terror attacks following 9/11.
DHS was recently criticized in a report by the Government Accountability Office for failing to achieve even half of what it was assigned to do, and leaving our country vulnerable to another major terror attack. But the fact is, there hasn't been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11.
Five years later, do you think the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is protective or ineffective?
Please refrain from profane, derogatory or off-topic comments (Please email us to flag inappropriate comments). Read Guidelines>>
Post 9/11: Are We Safer or Still Vulnerable?
On 9/11, our nation was transformed by an extraordinary act of hatred. Six years later, after dozens of foiled terror plots, billions spent on homeland security and thousands of lives lost in the war on terror, the United States has avoided a repeat terror attack. Regardless, many officials believe the U.S. faces an evolving terrorist threat. What do you think?
In this post 9/11 world, are we safer or is the U.S. still vulnerable to a major attack?
Please refrain from profane, derogatory or off-topic comments (Please email us to flag inappropriate comments). Read Guidelines>>
U.S. Government’s Eavesdropping Powers
Civil liberties groups say the new law goes too far and allows the government to wiretap U.S. residents who are communicating overseas without adequate oversight. White House officials say it will give intelligence professionals the essential tools they need to protect our nation from terrorism.
What do you think?
Please refrain from profane, derogatory or off-topic comments. Read Guidelines>>
Please email us to flag inappropriate comments>>
