KPBS.org

A percentage of every Amazon purchase you make from this search will support KPBS.

movies

You Don’t Mess with the Kung Fu Panda Zohan

Kung Fu Panda
Master Shifu teaches Po a lesson in Kung Fu Panda (Dreamworks)

This week I am pleased to introduce two new KPBS Teen Critics, Raymond Mai and Vikram Bhoyrul. They both had reviews up this week (of Kung Fu Panda and You Don't Mess with the Zohan,respectively) and I hope you check them out. Raymond is someone I've known since he was in elementary school with my son and he's always had very strong opinions about movies, so I'm thrilled to have him aboard. Vikram, on the other hand, I just met. I was introduced to his father at an Indian film screening and his dad explained how Vikram had started his own paper at Bishop's. Now that's initiative. Anyway, I hope you check out their reviews. But I wanted to throw my two cents in about Kung Fu Panda and You Don't Mess with the Zohan (both opened June 6 throughout San Diego). Also, being a martial arts fan I thought it was worth mentioning that three films that opened on Friday - Kung Fu Panda, You Don't Mess with the Zohan, and Foot Fist Way - contained martial arts to varying degrees.

First let me start with Kung Fu Panda, an American animated martial arts film about a panda with big dreams. The film seems in part to tap into the fact that all eyes are on China as it prepares to host the summer Olympics. The film starts with a strikingly animated prologue that turns out to be a dream. Po (voiced by Jack Black) is an eager, out of shape panda that wants nothing more than to be like the heroes that he worships (and has a full set of action figures of). This open got my interest up because the animation style recalled the Emmy-winning Cartoon Network show Samurai Jack. Unfortunately, when the dream ends, so does the innovative visual style and we're back to the standard 3-D computer animation that everyone is using. I know it's state of the art and I should appreciate how the hair looks so real... but all right already. Kudos to the technicians and animators. But this style of animation seems to place more emphasis on the technology than the artistry, and I've begun to grow weary of it.

I think that there is more visual innovation in animation occurring on American TV than in American animated features (I won't even mention the great stuff being made on a regular basis in Japan and increasingly in South Korea). The boldly animated Samurai Jack was the creation of Genndy Tarakovsky who went on to animate Clone Wars for Cartoon Network as well. Afro Samurai, a collaboration between the U.S. and Japan, also displayed a fresh, almost monochromatic animation style. All of these TV shows are far more cinematic than any animated American feature. They are also more experimental in narrative structure, often leaving long sections without dialogue, and knowing how to mix furious action with moments of absolute stillness and calm. These shows also emphasize the story and the telling of the story as opposed to the teaching of a lesson, which is why their appeal is across age groups. Okay, that's my little tangential rant/rave.

Kung Fu Panda
We are not impressed... the general reaction to Po's kung fu skills in Kung Fu Panda (Dreamworks)

But despite the predictably high-tech animation, Kung Fu Panda proves appealing as Po becomes the unlikely "chosen one" selected to defend the valley against the villainous escaped convict Tai Lung (Ian McShane of cable's Deadwood). Helping Po scale seemingly insurmountable odds is Master Shifu (Dustin Hoffman). But here's where I ran into another problem with the film. Dustin Hoffman provides the voice of a kung fu master while Jackie Chan - martial artist extraordinaire - gets a couple lines as one of the support team. As a fan of both Jackie Chan and martial arts action films, this was all wrong. Hoffman is hands down the better actor but why bother including a martial arts legend if you're not going to use him in a manner that honors his talent. I have to say that Chan's least impressive talent would be his voice, but if the film chose to use him then they should have had him be Master Shifu, or at the very least, the old turtle master. It's just disrespectful and downright wrong to not have Chan be the master. Having Chan voice Shifu would have allowed him to bring something beyond vocal talent to the role, and for many of us who are fans of Chan's it would have been an improvement to the film.

Kung Fu Panda
Ian McShane voices teh evil Tai Lung in Kung Fu Panda (Dreamworks)

But Chan's influence hangs over the film nonetheless. Kung Fu Panda steals (or the more polite word would be "borrows") heavily from Chan's films, especially Drunken Master. In that film, an elderly and a bit eccentric master devises a clever training program to teach a young student how to fight (a scenario typical of other Chan films and martial arts films). Kung Fu Panda, co-directed by Mark Osborne and John Stevenson with a screenplay by Jonathan Aibel and Glenn Berger, does develop some nice interplay between Po and Shifu, as the master discovers that food is the key to the hefty panda's training.

But the title character of Adam Sandler's new film needs no training at all. In You Don't Mess with the Zohan, Sandler plays a crack Israeli Mossad agent who fakes his own death so he can pursue his dream of being a hair stylist in New York. But once in the Big Apple the newly rechristened Scrappy Coco finds that the tensions of the Middle East have preceded him to America. Arabs, Palestinians and Israelis are still at war but in a different way on the streets of New York. But Zohan wants none of that. All he wants to do is style hair and find peace. But once a loony Arab cab driver (Rob Schneider) and a terrorist/entrepreneur (John Turturro) realize that Scrappy Coco is none other than the Zohan, all hell breaks loose.

You Don't Mess with the Zohan
John Turturro goes over the top in You Don't Mess with the Zohan (Columbia Pictures)

The racial stereotypes that emerge in this film are as over the top and potentially offensive as Eli Wallach's Tuco in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. But what redeems the film to some degree is its general good naturedness and overall message about peace and everyone just getting along. This film is not quite a pot comedy but it's definitely inhaling the fumes as it reveals a laidback attitude and an underlying sense that most people are nice and friendship is worth somethinhg. Maybe that's a direct result of Judd Apatow's involvement. Apatow served as one of the writers, and he's the man behind the TV show Freaks and Geeks and the feature film Knocked Up (definitely in the pot comedy mold). Apatow, despite a penchant for some gross out comedy, often displays an oddly sweet streak in his comedy and the comedy he produces (Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Superbad, Walk Hard). Sandler and Robert Smigel (of Triumph the Insult Dog fame) are the other two contributors to the screenplay. The film's tone may also benefit from the direction of former actor Dennis Dugan, who worked on one of Sandler's better features, Happy Gilmore.

The comedy in Zohan is very broad and very crude with Sandler's character providing not only hair styling but sex to all his middle-aged women clients. Hence his popularity. As for his lethal fighting skills, these are depicted in cartoon style with an emphasis on hilarious exaggeration. Not quite as inspired as Stephen Chow's work in Kung Fu Hustle but delightfully goofy in its absurdity. I find Sandler much funnier in roles where he's ridiculous yet cocky as opposed to the roles where he tries to be pathetic and funny and wring some emotions from the audience.

You Don't Mess with teh Zohan
All Adam Sandler's character whats to do is be a hairdresser in You Don't Mess with the Zohan (Columbia Pictures)

You Don't Mess with the Zohan (rated PG-13 for crude and sexual content throughout, language and nudity) follows in the footsteps of Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo in terms of trying to mix crude humor with current politics in order to deliver a message. But Harold and Kumar can deflect some criticism since at least the leads are actually actors of Korean and Indian heritage and it's the whites that are the victims of the most offensive stereotypes. In Zohan, however, you have Schneider in brown face make up) and Turturro playing Arabs and looking particularly stupid. Since neither the comedy nor the message is that sharp, these portrayals have the potential to offend -- even though characters prove nice guys in the end. Arab comedian Ahmed Ahmed (who was featured in the Vince Vaughn doc) does appear in a small role, but his stand up comedy addresses these political and racial issues with more insightful bite than this film. But for a dumb, crude comedy, Zohan proves oddly appealing despite numerous offenses.

Companion viewing for Kung Fu Panda: Samurai Jack, Drunken Master, Warriors of Virtue

Companion viewing for You Don't Mess with the Zohan: World Police, Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo, Knocked Up, Happy Gilmore, Caramel

Comments

Watch Movies // June 09, 2008 at 11:16 am:

I just watched Kunfu Panda.. haven’t watched Zohan yet, seems like a dumb movie… but watching Kung Fu Panda is definitely recommended.

Clintidote // June 09, 2008 at 11:49 am:

From the review: “But with Harold and Kumar can deflect some criticism since at least the leads are actually actors of Korean and Indian heritage and it’s the whites that are the victims of the most offensive stereotypes.”

Instead of just saying “it’s yet another crappy Adam Sandler movie”, leave it to the liberal PBS thumbsuckers to revert to type and whine about race.  But it’s fine to make whites the “victims” of course, because that’s not racist, it’s diversity and must be encouraged.

Sheesh.

Beth Accomando
Beth Accomando // June 10, 2008 at 5:49 pm:

Hey as soon as white males become a minority and are not the ones wielding most of the power in Hollywood, I’ll start defending them too.

Plus what I was pointing out was that there’s increased potential for offense when you have a white actor in “brown face.”

And I didn’t say it was a crappy Adam Sandler movie. It was one of his better ones. Being offensive doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not funny.

Thanks for the comment and for making me realize that I hadn’t properly proofread the sentence. I have since removed the unnecessary “with.”

K. Haugen // June 11, 2008 at 11:27 pm:

Media does not define artistry.
To say that the animation and visual affects in this film value technology over artistry is to display a complete lack of aesthetic taste. Yes, 3-D computer animation is popular and widely used. So is oil paint. And yet, there are countless masterpieces rendered in oil, on canvas, that are unique and trancendental in spite of the popularity and liberal use of the medium in which they are communicated. That being said, the animation in Kung Fu Panda stands out from most other computer animated films I’ve seen, and it truly is exlemplary. The harmonization of colors in each particular screen shot, suited to the mood of the scene it corresponds with, the character designs, the sets...everything is beautiful. It’s obvious that the animation in this film is the product not just of superior technologly, but of superior artists. Lots of them. Don’t downplay their acheivement just because you don’t have the ability to appreciate it.

Beth Accomando // June 12, 2008 at 6:48 am:

I agree that media does not define artistry, and I appreciated the 3D work in Ratatouille. But I also feel that American feature animation has placed too much emphasis on technology and not enough on creativity and stylistic innovation.

As I mentioned, I thought the open to Kung Fu Panda was brilliant and inspired. It dared to look different from all the other animated features. But the rest of the film relied on recycled character design that we have seen before. I’ll agree that the color palette was pleasing and a bit different but nothing—aside from the open dazzled me.

I prefer the 2D animation of Samurai Jack or any Hayao Miyazaki film, or the innovative mix of computer and hand drawn animation in Steamboy and Tekkon Kinkreet, or the clever use of rotoscoping techniques in Chicago Ten and Renaissance. In all these cases the filmmakers employed different technology for very specific effect. Kung Fu Panda, while enjoyable, looks like it came off a high tech assembly line. I’m not saying that it’s bad but rather that it could be better. I do appreciate all the hard work that goes into creating animation. But my opinion reflects my disappointment that Hollywood animation doesn’t display more variety.

Thanks for your comment but I would suggest that it represents a difference of opinion as opposed to an inability on my part to appreciate achievement in King Fu Panda.

daniel hernandez // September 25, 2008 at 10:43 am:

THE MOVIE IS SO FAN ALL THE MOVIE WAS LAFING I LIKE THE CHARECTER OF THE SNAKE AND THE LITE THING GREEN EVEN THIS MOVIE THEACH SOME LESSON OF THE LIFE THAT IF YOU WANT YOU CAN DOIT

semmy // September 25, 2008 at 9:03 pm:

Kungfu Panda is very nice movie. I hope this director gives such type of other film. Good Luck for other anomation film.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Submit A Comment

* Required








Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments
I agree to the KPBS Blog User Agreement and Guidelines