KPBS.org

A percentage of every Amazon purchase you make from this search will support KPBS.

movies

Wanted

 Standard Podcast: Download

Wanted
Angelina Jolie is about to change James McAvoy's life in Wanted (Universal)

I have openly confessed to being an action junkie. I love movies that can serve up a kinetic rush, and I frequently cue up a DVD just to watch an awesome fight scene or killer car chase - little fixes to tide me over until a new action film comes out. So if a film can deliver some stunning action set pieces, I can leave the theater with a smile on my face. If they can also deliver a good story and interesting characters, then that's even better. The new summer actioner Wanted (opening June 27 throughout San Diego) takes its cue from Mark Millar's graphic novel and serves up a high octane cocktail that will leave you with a little buzz and maybe even something to think about.

I saw the film before I read Millar's graphic novel so I didn't come to the film with images already stuck in my head about how the movie adaptation should look. I didn't even intend to read the graphic novel before writing my review but I picked up a copy because I was curious what it looked like. But then I read Brian K. Vaughn's introduction that said "if this is your first time reading Wanted, have fun, and get ready for those last two pages. Those of you who refuse to see what the conclusion is really saying will probably want to burn this beautiful collection the second you put it down... and to you chosen few who find yourself smiling when you finally reach the end of Wesley Gibson's journey? Welcome to the other side."

Well that was a come on I couldn't resist so I immediately sat down and raced through the book to get to those two pages. And Millar delivered. The film delivers too but not in exactly the same way and not with quite the knockout punch of the source material. Those familiar with the graphic novel will notice some immediate differences. No capes and tights, no one who dresses like a Marvel or DC super-hero, and no characters named Sh-thead or F-ckwit (I really would have liked to see Sh-thead but maybe he's being held for the sequel). The film Wanted looks more like the real world than the graphic novel despite its over the top action, and provides us with characters who are more accessible.

Yet the opening of the film does stick pretty close to the content and tone of the graphic novel. Wesley (James McAvoy) introduces us to his pathetic life. Wesley hates everything about his life - everything from his mind-numbing job to his girlfriend who screws his best friend on the table Wesley just picked up from Ikea to the fact that his dad abandoned him when he was an infant. As Wesley narrates what his life is like, we are taken on a surreal journey through his office where his chubby boss continually gnaws at his dignity and snaps an ever-present stapler in his face to get his attention. Then he meets Fox (Angelina Jolie looking a bit too anorexic to be holding guns as big as Fox's) at the pharmacy and his whole life changes. Fox reprimands him for apologizing too much and then informs him that his father was a top assassin who was just killed, and the man who killed him is in the store right behind Wesley.

Wanted
Angelina Jolie as Fox in Wanted (Universal)

Needless to say, this changes Wesley's dull existence quite dramatically. The film combines Fight Club and The Matrix to give us a beaten down character that suddenly wakes up to a different reality. From Fight Club, Wanted takes the tone and attitude of a man who feels his insignificance eating away at him and who suddenly finds a way to fight back. From The Matrix, it takes a dizzying, gravity-defying sense of action and of a character waking up to a new reality. Wesley is soon introduced to a group known as The Fraternity, which is run by a man named Sloane (Morgan Freeman). Wesley is initiated into the group so that he can hunt down his father's killer.

The twist, though, is that the actor playing Wesley is James McAvoy, the romantic lead from Atonement. He's a great and unusual choice; it's like casting Dustin Hoffman in The Graduate when everyone was expecting someone like Robert Redford. McAvoy's very much against type as an action hero. His performance gives a fresh take to the action film. It's a little bit like Robert Downey Jr.'s performance in Iron Man; it grounds the film in reality more. We can identify with the nerdy, short, and not very athletic looking McAvoy as he struggles through his training and seems initially quite ill suited to his task. McAvoy's performance makes the character more human despite all the outlandish things happening around him.

Wanted
James McAvoy with his new body... are those abs real or CGI? Wanted (Universal)

But once again a film has simplified the graphic novel on which it was based. Millar's book proposed a very bleak world where a band of killers join forces to rid the world of super-heroes. Millar's book was dark and suggested world neatly devoid of morality. The film tries to make Wesley sympathetic and moral. And the concluding scenes in the film try to make the "bad" people pay for their crimes. Now the ending - which actually plays out in two parts - is cleverly designed and shot. The final scene - the equivalent of the book's final two pages - has neither have the nihilistic swagger nor the sense of flipping off the audience that Millar managed to pull off so brilliantly in the book. But it has a little bite of fun and bite.

But the film, written by the trio of Michael Brandt, Derek Haas and Chris Morgan, creates unnecessary new complications while ignoring the more intriguing complications of the book. So in the film we get this loom of fate that spits out zeroes and ones as a code for who to kill, which is a bit lame. But we don't get the book's more complicated father-son relationship with its kicker resolution. The film serves up a kinder, gentler Wanted; one geared more for mall theater audiences.

Yet despite the film's shortcomings, it still delivers a kick-ass summer action film thanks to director Timur Bekmambetov. He's the Russian filmmaker who gave a much-needed transfusion to the vampire genre with Night Watch and Day Watch. Those films, like Wanted, center on an unlikely protagonist as well (Night Watch's disheveled Konstantin Khabensky makes an appearance in Wanted as The Exterminator.) What's fun to see is how Bekmambetov has made the move from low budget (by Hollywood standards) films in Russia to big budget Hollywood films. He takes the budget increase and uses it efficiently to make a killer action film. Bekmambetov especially excels at the car stunts - which were also a highlight in his vampire films. Cars speed through streets and fly through the air without paying the least heed to gravity. Then throw in some gunplay and it's a great ride. Bekmambetov treats the bullets with the same sense of dynamism as he treats the cars, so bullets collide into each other or fly through the city like a heat seeking missile winding around obstacles as it's locked on a target miles away. The film regularly defies reality and does so with the greatest sense of fun. Although an attack using rats as a secret weapon may enrage PETA. But aside from that, Bekmambetov endows the film with a joyous sense of action like a kid who just got his allowance upped and can buy bigger and better toys, and that's what makes the film a success.

Wanted
Fast cars, big guns and sexy girls... what more can you ask for in an action film? Wanted (Universal)

Bekmambetov also takes delight in the "action" of the office. He choreographs scenes with characters weaving through dull cubicles and gives us a quitting scene to rival Kevin Spacey sticking it to his boss in American Beauty. There's also a nice bit of business involving a keyboard and letters flying through the air to spell out Wesley's sentiments at the moment.

Wanted (rated R for strong bloody violence throughout, pervasive language and some sexuality) gets a thumbs up as an action film. If you liked McAvoy in Atonement, this might not be the film for you. But if you want to see guys who can bend bullets like Beckham does a soccer ball then this film is great fun. And if it had kept more of the graphic novel's originality, it could have even been a great film.

Companion viewing: Shoot ‘Em Up, Night Watch, Day Watch, Rory O'Shea was Here, American Beauty

Comments

RonM // June 28, 2008 at 11:12 am:

AS ALWAYS I ENJOY READING YOUR INSIGHTS INTO A MOVIE.  I ALSO APPRECIATE THAT YOU SAW THE MOVIE FIRST AND DIDN’T HAVE ANY PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS OF WHAT THE MOVIE SHOULD BE. YOU WERE FAIR AND PRESENTED THE DIFFERENCES AND MERITS OF BOTH THE MOVIE AND GRAPHIC NOVEL

Beth Accomando
Beth Accomando // June 28, 2008 at 12:15 pm:

Thanks for the comments. I did like both the movie and the graphic novel, and each came at the story a bit differently and each took ownership of the story in a different way. But I would recommend reading the graphic novel if you liked the movie. The book has a little extra kick that the movie doesn’t have.

It’s nice to know I have readers on the east coast.

Aaron Soto // June 28, 2008 at 3:52 pm:

I’m not a “Night watch” fan but this movie looks cool, is on my list.

Emma // June 29, 2008 at 3:29 pm:

Okay, now I need to read the graphic novel. You have me intrigued.

I thought McAvoy was brilliant choice here. I actually loathe the movie, Atonement, but everything else he is in is terrific and he has this thing where he can just flip a switch and he seems like a different person. One moment he’s a schlub, the next moment he’s a badass. Very cool.

Beth Accomando
Beth Accomando // June 29, 2008 at 6:08 pm:

Do read the graphic novel, it’s well worth it—different, though.

As for McAvoy, the director talked about how they had make up and costume changes to play up the differences in his character but that with just body language and facial expressions, McAvoy was able to convey the changes. The director cast him based on seeing his performance as the wheelchair bound character in Rory O’Shea was Here.

Thanks for your comment.

Max // July 01, 2008 at 1:02 am:

I didn’t care much for this action movie. It’s all show and not much of a story. James McAvoy was fortunately believable and he was good in it. However, the plot is full of holes and the resolution laughable. This is worse than Day Watch which was very much a showy turn and an audition for Hollywood.

Too bad, the story in the comics has the potential to be a good movie with even improvements.

Beth Accomando // July 01, 2008 at 9:11 am:

In a story where people can bend bullets, I’m willing to allow for some bending of reality. This was a popcorn movie for me and raised a notch by James McAvoy. Yes it could have been better if it drew more on teh graphic novel but with so many action films being bloated and dull (checkout Hancock) this one had such energy and fun that I couldn’t resist, even with its flaws.

Thanks for your comments.

PattiMarie // July 13, 2008 at 11:57 am:

I thought your review was on the money.  Normally I don’t really care for such action films but this one was truly a kick ass thriller.  Other reviewer wrote how unrealistic the film is and gave it a bad review on that point alone, but since when is an action thriller movie suppose to be real?  Also I appreciate your take on Jame McAvoy’s acting.  Morgan Freedman could do the role of wise man in his sleep, Angelina Joli seem to be coasting along as the tough chick, but McAvoy as the unlikely hero who goes from wimp to killer avenger while still keeping his wits was a perfect chose.  It was his acting alone that made this movie worth it.

Beth Accomando
Beth Accomando // July 13, 2008 at 1:05 pm:

Patti Marie,

Glad you checked out this film even though you’re not an action fan. And I think McAvoy was a brilliant choice and definitely a big reason why the film worked for me.

Thanks for your comments. You might also try Hellboy II. Ron Perlman makes Hellboy very appealing as well and Guillermo Del Toro does not deliver your typical action film. If you check it out, let me know what you think.

RonM // July 13, 2008 at 7:01 pm:

Enjoyed the movie so much, I decided to read the graphic novel. I didn’t like it. Not because I couldn’t take the violence, I can (actually found it tame - I grew up on Clint Eastwwod, Sam Peckinpaugh, and Night of the Living Dead). Not because it’s dark; there’s plenty of “dark” out there I enjoy. I didn’t enjoy it because there were no characters I found interesting; you can write about villains, you can write about evil, but make it interesting. I was bored. Maybe if I were thirteen years old (or a four year old) it would have been cool, but I’m not. Oh, and by the way it is so easy for the author to dismiss those who don’t like his work with a big F-you. Next time he should try writing something original. Thankfully the movie took very little from the source material, and then improved on it.

Beth Accomando
Beth Accomando // July 13, 2008 at 8:34 pm:

Ron,

I’m glad you tried the graphic novel, sorry it was a disappointment. I enjoyed both the film and the book for different reasons. But I liked the way the graphic novel was darker with the notion of having these villains rule the world and systematically try to kill all the superheroes. Plus the resolution with the father and with Fox were better in the book. I really didn’t like the whole loom thing in the film—that was unnecessarily complicated and silly—and the way they tried to morally redeem Fox.

I appreciate your comments, especially since you were raised on Eastwood, Peckinpah, and zombies. Good combo! But I’m glad you liked the movie. I’m a big fan of that Russian director, I think he knows how to deliver fun action.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Submit A Comment

* Required








Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments
I agree to the KPBS Blog User Agreement and Guidelines